PDA

View Full Version : MANGAMERICA #2: THE RUNAWAYS CONNECTION


raul grau
Jul 11, 2005, 05:21 pm
<img src="http://www.comixfan.com/xfan/images/columns/mangamerica.jpg" hspace=10 align=left border=0 alt="Mangamerica logo">By Marcina Riley, fantasyfiv@yahoo.com

The Runaways Connection

Tsunami was the name of a line of comics that Marvel created specifically to appeal to manga readers. The idea was to attract those readers and get them hooked on western comics. Marvel took the titles out of regular continuity and used mostly familiar characters, probably in hopes of keeping some of their current readership. It was a big project; however, of the initial offerings, only one title remains. The Runaways. The little title that could almost faced the same fate as many of its brethren, but it found its way to the crowd that it was always meant to be in, the graphic novel readers. Looking back, it really makes sense that comics that were supposed to be non-manga would fail in regular comic issue format. Yet, I don't think it was just format that spelled the demise of much of the Tsunami line. It's more than that; there is another reason why Runaways survived when the others didn't.

First off, the story isn't like anything else on the shelves. Brian K. Vaughan took a very simple idea and weaved it into a series. Every child has moments when they come to distrust their parents, but what if that child had a very good reason to distrust their parents, to feel betrayed by them? Runaways answers that.

At this point, I really haven't talked about how this is related to anime, or how it might correlate. It doesn't, at least not completely, but I don't think it has to. When looking the other titles on the list, there were series like Namor. Namor was a drama complete with teenage angst. Unfortunately, it pigeonholed the audience. Manga is a diverse medium, and although comics are slowly getting there, the primary fans are still mainstream fans. Diversity might not seem very important, but it is. By not putting his audience into a little group, by not bottling them, by just writing his story, Vaughan reached beyond the typical comic book box and did what the others could not. He reached a wider group, and yet a very specific group.

Another element of Vaughan's work is that it's told in a saga format. These days it's hard to find writers that can write a story that works both as single issues and as a whole arc, when collected as a graphic novel. Most stories today are broken and disjointed, they are divided poorly, but they read fine together. Vaughan doesn't have that problem. Each issue tells a complete and compelling story that when collected is only enhanced, but not dependant on the graphic novel form. Most manga writers have to do this. Manga comes out in short individual chapters that are later collected into smaller books. The writers must tell stories that are interesting in both forms. It's doesn't seem like it should be so hard, but considering most western comics either don't collect well, or don't spread over several issues well, it must be difficult. However, I have yet to read an issue of Runaways that wasn't good both ways.

Vaughan also uses a very classic group-based setup. Although western comics do this also, many times the characters themselves are important. The characters are made into a group, not a group made into characters. The characters, in western comics, can easily be taken out of their group and fly solo, but often times in manga, taking the character out of the group diminishes that character's strength and power. The characters are merely components of group. Would Sailor Moon work nearly as well if it was just that character? No, it's prequel series Codename: Sailor V proved that the characters work better together. Likewise, the characters in Runaways, although powerful, work as a team. They function not as individuals coming together as a group, but as a group who happen to be individuals. Each character plays a pivotal role, from Gert's brainy female, to Molly's cute innocent girl, to Nico's Goth chick, to Chase's dumb oaf, and finally to Karoline's pretty passionate woman.

Of course the art plays a big part in the series as well. Adrian Alphona's work is far more inspired by manga than the writing, and it's what really amazed me. The first time I looked at the characters, I was surprised at how unique they all look. Gert is pudgy, but not overly so, Karoline is slender, Nico somewhere in-between, and Molly still has baby fat in her checks. I find that in most mainstream books the women look mostly the same. It's not an unappealing look, but mostly they all have the same sized breasts, the same body type, and the same face. It was truly refreshing to read a book and see characters that look the way they are supposed to look, and that reminds me a lot of what I like in manga. Clamp has no trouble rendering characters to look their age; young children look like kids, and teenagers look like teenagers. There's also a distinctive look about them; noses just aren't the same on two different people. Granted, in manga noses sometimes are nothing more than lines, but it's the attention to detail that stands out; it gives the characters a more human quality.

Alphona also has a way with facial features; they aren't quite as outlandish as the anime ones, but the characters' faces change. They wear their emotions on their faces. When Gert is shocked, one eye goes up, similar to how in manga one large eye is drawn to portray shock. Of course, total shock is two large eyes with tiny pupils; Alphona has his own way of rendering that as well. The mouths also move and squirm into all sorts of positions. They mimic anger, sadness, and uncertainty. Surely, it's easy to see when Molly is upset because Alphona gives her a very large frown. Nico bites her lip when she's nervous, and Chase makes a big face with his yelling. Again, this is another element of the characters' humanity. It pulls the characters from the pages and gives them a sense of reality.

I'm not going to say the Runaways was inspired by manga, because that denotes a strong level of spillover. However, I will say that, like many things these days, it is influenced by it. There isn't anything that I could completely point out and talk about, but the details are where the real comparison is. The saga feeling of the story as Brian K. Vaughan slowly works to some specific point that a reader can witness. The characters aren't just growing as they would in a typical comic book setting, but they are moving; there's a direction he's going, and it can be felt. The series may be broken into individual pieces, but they work both in issue format and collected. The art follows and flows. Each character is a distinct human. They have nervous ticks, they have habits, and they have individual styles.

Perhaps, I'm overly romanticizing manga, but I can't help but think that the very realistic quality of manga is what makes it different from its western counterpart. I have yet to open the cover of a manga and not feel, even just a little bit, that this might just be possible, that what's occurring might actually happen. When a character cries, I cry with them; I feel their pain. I get those same sort of emotional reactions, those same passionate grips with Runaways. It might be my imagination, but when I look at the series from its parts and really examine them. I don't think so. The fact that the series did reach its target audience and became popular makes me think that I can't be the only one who feels that way. Runaways is comic that definitely bridges the gap between the two different mediums, and does it well.

<center><hr width=75%></center>

Marcina Riley blames the above on sugar, lack of sleep, an evil approaching due date, and perhaps a bias to all things new and inventive.

<center><hr width=75%></center>

The opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the writer, and are not reflective of Comixfan or its other staff in general.

Ricochet
Jul 11, 2005, 07:00 pm
I couldn't agree with you more. It's nice to see a full column about Runaways.

x-cess
Jul 11, 2005, 08:27 pm
actally, "runaways" is not the only tsunami book that survived; "new mutants" survived as "new x-men". ok, it changed the title, but its still the same comic, and "runaways" got relaunched too.

bravelybravesirrobin
Jul 11, 2005, 10:15 pm
and sentinel is coming back too I believe


One thing in this article confused me. The comment about decompressed sstory telling and how modern comics don't work as well as individual issues, and that manga doesn't. Now I haven't read a huge amount of manga but I've looked at a small amount and in my experience Manga is even worse than american comics for doing this. I've picked up a few Shonen Jumps and Raijin Comics and it's my understanding that all Manga in japan is published in anthologies like this. Well in an average Jump story nearly nothing happens, it's a tiny, tiny progression in plot (not helped by the ENORMOUS panels that are commonly used). Back when I read Ranma 1/2 I picked up a few of the floppies that Viz published and I can recall whole issues, in fact 3 or 4 in a row that could all be the same fight. This isn't really a criticism, and i'll admit my own ignorance to a lot of product but frankly the author's comment just seems wrong.



Of course nothing is as bad as British comics. Pick up Jack Staff (it's awesome) or 2000 AD to get an idea of how little plot progression actually occurs in an inidividual issue.

Seth Kim
Jul 12, 2005, 12:53 am
Great column. I couldn't agree with you more about diversity in manga.

Kevin Sutton
Jul 12, 2005, 01:29 am
I liked this column a lot. Runaways is not overtly manga inspired, but it is influenced by elements common in manga. There are elements in the manga literary culture which you don't see much of in the North American comics industry. (At least among major publishers)

Manga is really the same as comics, so it's not as if the qualities can be said to be manga. But, those qualities reflecting elements which are in large part repsonsible for the growth of manga comics in the North American market can be found in Runaways.

Runaways isn't a book that treats manga as something to be imitated or attempted; instead Vaughan and the crew saw the success of manga and saw what they had that NA comics lacked.

But these things aren't necessarily what the direct market audience wants, and there was nothing indicating to the rest of the comics buying public that this was something they should look at. Cosequently the book initially ran into trouble. However, the book's qualities are the reason why it developed a hardcore following, gained critical acclaim, had/has incredibly stable sales, had success in digest form, and why it bounced back so successfully with its second debut.

Runaways didn't have the immediate and obvious appeal of a TokyoPop or Viz title, or something obviously manga. But it is gaining a stronger following because it has those qualities which made manga books so successful and which aren't necessarily desired by the hardcore Marvel/DC audience or found in those publisher's books.

Joey Meyers
Jul 12, 2005, 02:03 am
Interesting article. Are we going to see one on "Amerimanga" publisher Antarctic Press's 20th anniversary at some point?

irish_star
Jul 12, 2005, 02:30 am
Good article.
I think the success of Runaways is in it's wide appeal which has attracted a large female fanbase who might not be as passonate about comics in general, but very passionate about Runaways. Runaways also has a pretty hardcore fanbase in general which is not seen in many comics, where they constantly spread the gospel to friends. Runaways has been very word-of-mouth since the beginning and I'm glad to see it's exceding selling predictions with it's relaunch.

Dylan McKay
Jul 12, 2005, 02:57 am
Not directly on topic, but, what exactly is the difference between manga and comics? Why do people so fervently choose one or the other? I read mostly comics, due in large part because of easier access to knowledge about series. But I read both and the only difference I can find is one is 5 x 7 and the other is 7 x 10...

evilomar
Jul 12, 2005, 09:44 am
Not directly on topic, but, what exactly is the difference between manga and comics? Why do people so fervently choose one or the other? I read mostly comics, due in large part because of easier access to knowledge about series. But I read both and the only difference I can find is one is 5 x 7 and the other is 7 x 10...

I have been reading manga for 16 years and have tried to get my comic book reading friends to share some of these wonderful stories with me. For some reason their main excuse is color, they want vibrant colors in their comic book heroes. Now keep in mind these are the same guys that also read Sin City. Anyway after years of trying, about two years ago most of them are finally starting to read manga. By the way nice column.

Phasmal
Jul 13, 2005, 11:48 am
Good idea, great subject matter, poor execution...

Al Harahap
Jul 24, 2005, 07:40 am
Interesting thoughts about Tsunami, Marci. I don't think Marvel really pushed the books to manga readers as well as they could have. For starters, manga readers are used to reading big chunks of story. If I'm not mistaken, the collected compact-sized digests of Sentinel did fairly well in general bookstores for an American comic. So if the offering is a 20-30 page glimpse, it's hard to reel them in.

One thing in this article confused me. The comment about decompressed sstory telling and how modern comics don't work as well as individual issues, and that manga doesn't. Now I haven't read a huge amount of manga but I've looked at a small amount and in my experience Manga is even worse than american comics for doing this. I've picked up a few Shonen Jumps and Raijin Comics and it's my understanding that all Manga in japan is published in anthologies like this. Well in an average Jump story nearly nothing happens, it's a tiny, tiny progression in plot (not helped by the ENORMOUS panels that are commonly used). Back when I read Ranma 1/2 I picked up a few of the floppies that Viz published and I can recall whole issues, in fact 3 or 4 in a row that could all be the same fight. This isn't really a criticism, and i'll admit my own ignorance to a lot of product but frankly the author's comment just seems wrong.

I don't think it's absolutely one way or the other, but being a manga reader myself, I'd say that there's some truth to the generalisation. No, manga series aren't all anthologised like Shonen Jump and Raijin Comics. There are more manga anthologies there than what's seen in the U.S. and the U.K., but they still love their thick volumed installments. What may make shorter manga series installments in anthologies work is that readers get a bit of this and a bit of that, and then some, including the odd articles and interviews in some publications. It's all about the variety. But then reading culture in Japan is different to that in the U.S./U.K., so it's hard to say. It's like a DC Comics anthology collecting a particular month's issues of Batman, Scooby-Doo, MAD, The Authority, and Hellblazer might work over there, but would probably bomb in the U.S./U.K. market.

Not directly on topic, but, what exactly is the difference between manga and comics? Why do people so fervently choose one or the other? I read mostly comics, due in large part because of easier access to knowledge about series. But I read both and the only difference I can find is one is 5 x 7 and the other is 7 x 10...

If I know you as well as I think I do, it's because you're open with your reading and don't limit yourself. For many readers, there's a pretty stringent style filter. You don't even need to look across the Pacific Ocean. Many readers won't even get both mainstream superhero comics and so-called "indies," and prefer to limit themselves to just one or the other -- let alone something that inherently carries the narrative styles and traits of a foreign culture like manga. It's all comics just the same to some people, but vastly different comics to others.

chickrockguitar
Dec 29, 2005, 09:36 am
Nice to see "Runaways" get some Topics. We Love Runaways!