PDA

View Full Version : TYPOGRAPHICAL ERRORS #4: THE MAXISERIES


Alex Groff
Mar 3, 2005, 04:05 pm
<img src="http://www.comixfan.com/xfan/images/columns/te_logo.gif" align=left width=115 height=100 border=0 alt="Typographical Errors">by Alex Groff

If there was a *bling bling* of the 1980s comic book world, it was the maxiseries. It was a story so freaking important that it couldn't be told in four puny issues—so earthshattering that it couldn't be an ongoing series or the world would, I don't know, implode or something. We're talking twelve issues stories, where anything can happen and everyone will make a guest appearance at least twice (or more if they have clones or future selves from alternate realities).

When I was younger and more foolish, I bought myself a copy of Crisis on Infinite Earths and read through that mammoth volume. I made the same mistake with the Secret Wars, and while there are those who think that a maxiseries should include every superhero in the company universe and a few extras made up for good measure, I have to say that I wasn't terribly impressed either way.

But think about the idea of a maxiseries for a minute. Batman: Hush could have been a maxiseries. Loeb was already famous for his maxiseries work with Tim Sale on Batman: Long Halloween, Batman: Haunted Knight and Batman: Dark Victory. The idea is great. I mean, you can tell a lot of story in 12 issues. Twelve issues is the first season of Sleeper. Add one issue and it's the first season of The Ultimates, which was no slouch of a story. In a miniseries, you're in and out in four issues, six if you're lucky. Rucka's Batman: Death and the Maiden was an almost unheard of eight issues— bordering on maxiseries territory.

Some stories just aren't meant to be ongoing series, but they're too much for a miniseries, or even a graphic novel. Let's look at the numbers. Graphic novels normally top out at about 150 pages: most of them are closer to 90-120 pages. It's a rare treat when you get something like Box Office Poison, From Hell or Blankets, all crossing the six-hundred page barrier. (Notice that all three are from the same publisher, Top Shelf Productions.) So, being generous, let's say graphic novels are generally not longer than 180 pages. A regular size maxiseries (twelve 22-page issues, introductions, cover galleries, and all the other extras) is nearing 300 pages, if not more.

Compare Alan Moore's Batman: A Killing Joke to Watchmen and you get a reference as to the gap between graphic novels and maxiseries.

And there are other reasons you would want a maxiseries instead of a graphic novel, beyond size. A maxiseries is designed for a number of plot twists and surprises. At the end of each issue of Watchmen, you were left hanging. Graphic novels like Orbiter, Mr. Punch or Mystery Play are more unified: there is no cliffhanger, and their plot twists are a different breed than comic plot twists. (This is perhaps part of the reason they are generally not as long as maxiseries.) No, maxiseries are their own special creature.

And the potential a maxiseries offers is incredible. First off, you have the space to do something really off the wall if you want. Joe Casey and Ash Wood got together and created Automatic Kafka, which was intended to be twelve issues, and was instead cut down to nine. (Not being an insider, I can only speculate how much of this was caused by sales, and how much cased by creative delays and shipping confusions— but speculation is not important.) Automatic Kafka was, for its poor reception, an impressive feat. They could tell an entire story that would never have been contained in four or six issues, and yet when it was over, they could pack up their bags and go home: no one is ever going to write another Automatic Kafka story. Ever.

The same is true for Grant Morrison's The Filth. Now, I understand that a lot of people bought this book because Morrison was writing New X- Men at the time, and a few brains melted while reading it. For those of you in this situation, my sincerest apologies. But here was a story that was unquestionably too large for a miniseries, but self-contained, and ill-suited for a graphic novel. Why wouldn't it be a graphic novel? Well, to be blunt, it was too weird. Wait wait wait. I loved The Filth, but the reason I loved it is because I read it one chapter at a time. That's my personal rule for trade paperbacks: one chapter a night. Each chapter was like peeling back another layer of weird to reveal even more underneath. Taken in pieces, it was intriguing and awe-inspiring. All at once? The sensory overload would have had me drooling on the floor right now, being spoonfed I-don't-want-to-know-what by all the students I failed last year. (Karma, it seems, is not your friend.)

I keep thinking that P.I. stories would be great for this format: really dark French existential noir, or even Lynch/Murakami-style surreal noir. Because we don't have a lot of good noir books (Gotham Central, Stray Bullets, an occasional miniseries by Brubaker or Ellis, and that's about it on the straightforward noir front). Part of the reason is the format. If you can tell a noir story in four issues, there's not enough going on. But at the same time, the crime will be found out, or the criminals will be caught, or the P.I. will be killed by the sexy lady who hired him in a strange strawberry-scented double cross. Any way you slice it, the story has to end.

And really, it doesn't have to be crime. I just think of crime because I've always wanted to see comics that did things like Pynchon's The Crying of Lot 49, Robbe-Grillet's Repetition, Mark Danielewski's House of Leaves, Haruka Murakami's The Wind-Up Bird Chronicles. The comics market is full of diversity, but there are still areas that we haven't even begun to explore. Movies and tv shows can't compete with the kind of freedom that comics have— if we explore our potential and open our eyes to what comics can do.

Think, for example, of Andi Watson's Love Fights, his Oni Press maxiseries about superheroes and everyday life. Or Brubaker's Authority: Revolution. And one of my favorite maxiseries, Joe Casey and Leo Manco's Deathlock. What made it so great? Well, I hate Deathlock. I always have, and I probably will in the future. But here was a story I could sink my teeth into: it starts with a bang, it sets up the anti-hero while also setting up the villain, then the villain loses, the anti-hero wins, the bastard bureaucrat really loses, and it's over. A good maxiseries is like a rush of blood to the head: it breathes life into something, takes you for a wild ride and when it's done you're left with your hands on your knees, gasping for air.

You don't need to follow a maxiseries up with anything, and it offers no promises. When Superman died, somewhere deep down inside, we knew he was coming back. I mean, three of the four books are named after him. When Jean Grey died again, we rolled our eyes. She's an integral part of the ongoing series: she's stay dead long enough to sell memorial flowers, and then she'll be back. In a maxiseries, there is none of that promise. At the end of Casey's Deathlock, the lead character retired. At the end of The Filth, Greg Feely's rebellion was over, and everything returned to STATUS:Q. I won't tell you who dies at the end of Collateral, but it wasn't who I was expecting.

What you have in a maxiseries is an incredible amount of space to tell an intricate story, without any of the certainty or unwanted stability that an ongoing series demands. We're seeing more of these now than we have probably ever before, but they have a great deal of storytelling potential that we still have barely even noticed.

And let's take it to the next level, just for fun. Imagine a Prestige maxiseries. Twelve 64-page issues? That's 768 pages of story. Now we're cooking with fire.

<center><hr width=75%></center>

Continuing with my webcomics recommendations.... If comics could be visual haikus, they would be www.asofterworld.com. Whether dealing with heartbreak (http://www.asofterworld.com/soft_sep19_2003.htm), superheroes (http://www.asofterworld.com/soft_jun4_2004.htm), robot boyfriends (http://www.asofterworld.com/soft_jul16_2004.htm) or other things that shouldn't be mentioned (http://www.asofterworld.com/soft_sep24_2004.htm), Joey and Emily know how to grab their audience. Sometimes you'll laugh, sometimes you'll offer an unexpected "aw" of sympathy, and other times you'll just sit back and smile. I can't say that I've been disappointed by them yet.

<center><hr width=75%></center>

The opinions expressed in this column are solely those of the writer, and are not reflective of ComiX-Fan or its other staff in general.

Dylan McKay
Mar 3, 2005, 09:17 pm
I agree with you one hundred percent. Meatier than a mini-series. But without any limitations on the final punch, like an ongoing has.

Although I love reading maxi-series in trade form. I just love that literary rush.

In an effort to stir some discussion, what are everyone's favourite maxi-series? And if possible, why?

Mitch Brown
Mar 3, 2005, 10:14 pm
Good reed Alex. I'm a big supporter of the maxi-series in comic books, as well as the recent trend towards "Volumes" and "Seasons" of larger narratives.




And let's take it to the next level, just for fun. Imagine a Prestige maxiseries. Twelve 64-page issues? That's 768 pages of story. Now we're cooking with fire.

Indeed we are, from a creative point of view but I think such a thing has commercial failure stamped all over it.

Succesfful Prestige format series usually run for no more than 3-4 issues (think DK2 or Superman: Strength). Given the price of each issue, commiting to a twelve-issue Prestige maxi-series is quite a large financial commitment. Hell, buying ONE Prestige format issue can be risky business.

Take the regular comic book consumer's compulsion towards completeness. If you purchase one issue of a 3-issue Prestige format series, with the additional costs involved that you're somewhat ambivalent towards (say the pacing bothers you or the art, or the writing..whatever) there's still a good chance that you will pick up the following 2 issues - the financial outlay to get the whole story isn't that great. And if if the whole thing is a let-down, well at least its only been 3 issues.

Prestige format is a big risk for publishers in the current climate as well. Look how many regular format series are canned before the 12 issue mark. Imagine having gotten 7 issues in to a 12-issue prestige format series when DC (or whoever) pulls the plug due to lack of sales. Risky for the publisher, risky for the consumer.

Also, what about trade collections? I think one of the great things about maxi-series is that its quite easy to form a singular bound collection of the whole work. I for one, like being able to buy something like Watchmen and know that I have the complete story right there in my hands and I don't need to buy anything else. If I don't like it well...I've only bought one volume.

In a similar vein, consider the "Wait for the Trade" crowd. You'll lose out of singular sales as people sit and wait for the whole thing to come out and whether there will be a trade paperback or not.

Don't get me wrong here, personally I can see a hell of a lot of artistic and creative merit in a 12 issue, 64-page per Prestige series. Great production values, lots of story -- could be absolutely killer if you put a high-flying creative team on it who can actually shift the units.

In an effort to stir some discussion, what are everyone's favourite maxi-series? And if possible, why?

As much as I don't want to be boring, I've probably got to go with Watchmen and The Filth.

Watchmen...reasons are obvious I suppose. Its just such a perfect narrative that has taught me a hell of a lot about pacing and sequential storytelling in general.

The Filth..the qlippothic Invisibles. I'm astounded at how bad a reception that series got, but then I suppose a lot of that has to do with people coming over from New X-Men and expecting more of the same.

For all its perversity, its a beautiful story at heart. The only real issue with the series was the delays (unfortunately seemingly a constant on Morrison's Vertigo work). While I agree that it worked as a serial, the long wait between some of the issues was quite disruptive.

I think that there's another key to a successful maxi-series - it has to be on-time to ensure the impact of each part of the serial. A month seems to be the longest that I can go without needing to refer back to previous issues to job my memory as to what exactly is going on (Whether this is nature or nurture, I really don't know), which is something that can hurt the maxi-seres IMO.

Joel Phillips
Mar 3, 2005, 10:44 pm
Yeah, the maxi-series is a creative boon when done properly... but how often is it done properly? My big problem with maxi-series is that they often feel the need to be grandoise and in doing so become either needlessly complicated or pretentious (or both). You get stories like Crisis or Secret Wars that are packed with so much story and so many characters, making them so dense that their impact is muted. The creators see 12 whole issues to fill and pack it with so many characters doing so many things that we just get lost. Contrast that with Watchmen, where we have what is a very simple plot that, on its own, could never fill the 12 issues. Instead, Moore fills out the series with characterization, with conversations and memories and introspection. The end result is something which is meatier not because of a bloated cast or an impenetrable plot, but because it devotes sufficient time to its characters to make the story more intimate than these kinds of stories usually are.

Watchmen is, as Mitch says, the standard pick, but its my favorite too. Definately what I want out of maxi-series... you bring depth to the piece by filling the space with characterization, not more characters. If you want the perfect example of everything I hate about maxi-series, read the various Earth X books: a pretentious exercise bulging with far more characters and ideas than the creators know what to do with, the end result of which is depth and importance for nobody.

Mitch Brown
Mar 3, 2005, 11:51 pm
The creators see 12 whole issues to fill and pack it with so many characters doing so many things that we just get lost.....If you want the perfect example of everything I hate about maxi-series, read the various Earth X books: a pretentious exercise bulging with far more characters and ideas than the creators know what to do with, the end result of which is depth and importance for nobody.

True, true.

However, that's a phenomenon particular to superhero comics and the quite honestly sub-par writing that a significant proportion of that genre brings with it . ANother point to note is that in the case of Secret Crisis X a lot of the reasons for producing such a series are purely monetary/marketing. Earth X not so much (good concept that got just milked until it bled) as the other two examples. Crisis did serve a purpose - restarting the DCU however. Secret Wars were nothing more than toyline advertisements pitting everyone together for the hell of it.

But then you have titles like Superman: Birthright which actually had purpose. While I didn't actually read it and can't comment on its quality, there was definitely a direction there and a legimate argument for running it as a maxi-series.

What I'm interested in is how Phil Jimenez's Otherworld will fare - a twelve issue series that would appear to have a proper beginning, middle and end, set within its own mythos. While I can't comment on the content, I think this kind of thing is something we need to see more of - original works in the standard 22 page form with a finite "maxi-series" lifespan.

A finite, twelve issue series original series isn't a huge stretch for a publisher to commit to. It doesn't stand to lose that much money on it if it fails (as opposed to the publishing costs of OGNs or Prestige format minis) - it stills sells standard ad space. If the series is well-received, it may then become a highly successful trade collection that the company can keep in print for years to come.

Y2J Liontamer
Mar 3, 2005, 11:58 pm
Just pointing out that Batman: Haunted Knight wasn't a maxiseries, but rather several collected Loeb/Sale collab stories from various LotDK annuals if I recall correctly.

Anand Khatri
Mar 4, 2005, 03:19 am
In an effort to stir some discussion, what are everyone's favourite maxi-series? And if possible, why?

The Squadron Supreme, Watchmen, and Batman: The Long Halloween. Classic :bleep:.

The Squadron Supreme was the first I ever read. It was a great series since it had its own little universe to work with, it never got too complicated nor did it get too simplistic. It was a perfectly done 'mature'-esque series. it was done where it was serious and intense (Tom Thumb's sickness and other such stuff), but at the same time being clean enough for kids to pick up and read.

Watchmen for the same thing as Mitch said. Its just a work of art.

Batman:The Long Halloween was just awesome. It would make the perfect movie if it was done scence by scene as in the book itself.

...the "Wait for the Trade" crowd.

I think that was one of the major reasons to why the maxi-series has sorta died. People would rather just wait and get their story at one whole shot, but I'm old skool about stuff like this. I hardly get trades (only when I want to get into a series, just to catch up) I rather get every single issue. Guess thats sorta impractical now since I have limited space, but who gives a :bleep:.

Phasmal
Mar 4, 2005, 11:25 am
I just finished two of the greatest maxi-series I've ever read: Squadron Supreme and Midnight Nation. I urge anyone who has not read these to pick them up. They should be mentioned in the same breath as Watchmen and Dark Knight Returns, and in some cases, are better than those two.

Squadron has just about everything I've seen before in a comic crammed in perfectly (and it is 20 years old for those about to say that means it's not innovative). It's got a love story or five, many questions on the ethics of superheroics, very meaningful character death (and no one comes back!), and powerful characterization and fleshing out of about a dozen main characters, just to name a few. Not even Watchmen so closely examines everything a superhero story could be.

Midnight Nation, aside from looking gorgeous, has an awesome tale that, while not completely innovative, is certainly its own take on a story idea not many have seen before. It's got incredible characterization, and the overall feel of the book is quite powerful. It's one of those stories that makes you want to be a better person as soon as you finish it. You know what I'm talking about.

I've had a really great past couple of weeks since I've had those two books to read. I give them my highest recommendation.

BoomBot
Mar 4, 2005, 01:22 pm
I still say Earth X is one of the best stories I've read. I think it is a lot like Joel's explanation of Watchmen, in that is has a basic plot (which is more complex than Watchmen's) but fills itself with other stories. It might not be intimate conversations but they're insights and discoveries into the Marvel Universe. It is quite big but if you're an old-time Marvel reader, it's definitely for you. Also, people see it as a big story of three volumes (Earth, Universe, and Paradise X). It's not like X-Men: The End; you can read the first and it's complete. The story just does a great job of tapping into who the characters are and bringing back a classic feel.

Secret Wars were nothing more than toyline advertisements pitting everyone together for the hell of it.I don't see how it was a toy ad considering it wasn't directed towards kids. It was expensive, a long read, and artistically mature. I hear it's supposed to be a decent story too.

Joel Phillips
Mar 4, 2005, 02:52 pm
The Squadron Supreme

Yeah, how did I forget that one? Also great stuff. Maybe Gruenwald's best work, and damn is that saying something.

I still say Earth X is one of the best stories I've read. I think it is a lot like Joel's explanation of Watchmen, in that is has a basic plot (which is more complex than Watchmen's) but fills itself with other stories. It might not be intimate conversations but they're insights and discoveries into the Marvel Universe. It is quite big but if you're an old-time Marvel reader, it's definitely for you.

Well just to clarify, it's not "definately" for old-time Marvel readers, because I'm an old-time Marvel reader who thinks it stinks out loud. I just felt that needed to be said lest people think that it appeals to all truly hardcore Marvel fans... it doesn't.

Chris Day
Mar 4, 2005, 06:44 pm
I still say Earth X is one of the best stories I've read. I think it is a lot like Joel's explanation of Watchmen, in that is has a basic plot (which is more complex than Watchmen's) but fills itself with other stories. It might not be intimate conversations but they're insights and discoveries into the Marvel Universe. It is quite big but if you're an old-time Marvel reader, it's definitely for you. Also, people see it as a big story of three volumes (Earth, Universe, and Paradise X). It's not like X-Men: The End; you can read the first and it's complete. The story just does a great job of tapping into who the characters are and bringing back a classic feel.


I agree, i think that Earth X, Universe X and Paradise X collectively is the greatest epic to ever come out of Marvel Comics. and in the last decade of reading various comics from Marvel and beyond, i have only found Sandman to be a greater Epic story.

i couldn't get into Watchmen when i first attempted to read it (in 2004), and haven't really been able to get into much of Alan Moore's works, unfortunately...

some of my other favourite maxi series include, Avengers Forever, Inhumans (Jenkins), Fathom (first series)
there's a whole lot of other stuff on a similar scale that i enjoyed, but you can't really quantify as maxi series, maybe just a large limited series or a short ongoing series...

Alex Groff
Mar 5, 2005, 08:12 am
My favourite? Hrm... I'm going with Automatic Kafka, just because it was the first comic to really blow my mind and make me realize just exactly what comics can do. I love Watchmen, and the Filth is probably near the top as well, but the sheer focused insanity of Automatic Kafka really caught me and kept me waiting for each issue.

there's a whole lot of other stuff on a similar scale that i enjoyed, but you can't really quantify as maxi series, maybe just a large limited series or a short ongoing series...That's what, to me, a maxiseries is. For the most part, we use the term to describe 12 issue series, but what about 18 issue series that are done in eighteen issues? Or Sleeper, which is 24 issues (25 if you count coup d'etat) and then finished? I'm not sure a maxiseries has to fit into one volume... the more defining feature, to me, is whether or not it tells a complete, untouchable story.

I think the maxiseries is structurally my favourite format, because it most resembles a novel. Longer series-- even ones like The Sandman-- detour far more than a novel does. Hellboy is three volumes of detours with the main story in both bookends: 1 & 5. And while I enjoy them (Gaiman and Mignola both do brilliant detours), I prefer the intensity of a novel, or a maxiseries.

James Groves
Mar 5, 2005, 09:00 am
Very Good read, Alex.

I myself prefer maxiseries, too. Which is one of the reasons i love Sleeper so much.

Dylan McKay
Mar 5, 2005, 04:55 pm
I think we can all agree that Sonic Disruptors is the best maxi-series ever...

Err, I mean Watchmen.

I think that there's another key to a successful maxi-series - it has to be on-time to ensure the impact of each part of the serial. A month seems to be the longest that I can go without needing to refer back to previous issues to job my memory as to what exactly is going on (Whether this is nature or nurture, I really don't know), which is something that can hurt the maxi-seres IMO.

I read The Filth as a trade and in one day, and I still had to constantly check back...


Midnight Nation, aside from looking gorgeous, has an awesome tale that, while not completely innovative, is certainly its own take on a story idea not many have seen before. It's got incredible characterization, and the overall feel of the book is quite powerful. It's one of those stories that makes you want to be a better person as soon as you finish it. You know what I'm talking about.


My personal favourite. Just spoke to me in a way that no other comic ever has.


That's what, to me, a maxiseries is. For the most part, we use the term to describe 12 issue series, but what about 18 issue series that are done in eighteen issues? Or Sleeper, which is 24 issues (25 if you count coup d'etat) and then finished? I'm not sure a maxiseries has to fit into one volume... the more defining feature, to me, is whether or not it tells a complete, untouchable story.


Reminds me of another fave, Walter Simonsen's Orion. When I read it, I thought it was a maxi-series, but apparantly it was cancelled. That said, it read like a maxi-series.

I think the maxiseries is structurally my favourite format, because it most resembles a novel. Longer series-- even ones like The Sandman-- detour far more than a novel does. Hellboy is three volumes of detours with the main story in both bookends: 1 & 5. And while I enjoy them (Gaiman and Mignola both do brilliant detours), I prefer the intensity of a novel, or a maxiseries.

I like the detours. Some of my favourite comics are detours. What I love is when you can't actually tell what a detour is and what isn't, like in 100 Bullets.

Anand Khatri
Mar 5, 2005, 05:04 pm
That's what, to me, a maxiseries is. For the most part, we use the term to describe 12 issue series, but what about 18 issue series that are done in eighteen issues? Or Sleeper, which is 24 issues (25 if you count coup d'etat) and then finished? I'm not sure a maxiseries has to fit into one volume...

Exactly. One of my favorite maxi-series which I forgot to mention before is "Crimson" from Cliffhanger. It's four trades long (about 24 - 25 issues)! It beautifully done. Its written well and its some of Hhumberto Ramos's best artwork.

Dylan McKay
Mar 9, 2005, 08:15 pm
I was thinking, everything I read about The Filth is that it was dark and depressing. What does it say about me that I thought it was a hilarious blast and one of the more fun comics I've read?